III. G.  DeKalb Technical College

Personnel Evaluation, Staff Development and Improvement Plans

An annual evaluation of work performance will be completed for all employees of DeKalb Technical College according to the following procedures:

Employees shall be evaluated annually. The evaluation will be documented by the supervising manager and submitted through channels to the Office of Human Resources.  As part of the evaluation process, managers and employees identify developmental opportunities that will enhance employees’ skills, students’ successes, and add value to the programs at DeKalb Technical College. 

Performance evaluation instruments provide a summary of general performance for job responsibilities assigned to the employee.  Examples of categories that may be included on evaluations include the following:

  1. Leadership/Management Skills
  2. Initiative and Time Management
  3. Professionalism/Public/Inter-Office Relations
  4. Teaching and Learning
  5. Course and Curriculum Development
  6. Interpersonal Relations/Teamwork
  7. Professional Development
  8. Student Service and Support
  9. College and Community Service
  10. Terms and Conditions of Employment
  11. Job-Specific Responsibilities

 

PLANNING PROCESS

At the beginning of the evaluation period, individual planning and strategy sessions will be conducted by the supervisor and employee to discuss/review long-term goals and objectives, performance expectations and clarify any concerns related to job responsibilities.  The supervisor should also discuss how the job duties assigned will support the mission and goals of the College.  Whenever there is a conflict in assignments, the supervisor will make the final decision with the input of the supervising Dean.  

 

EVALUATION PERIOD PROCESS

Performance management is not just a once-a-year evaluation and planning session but a year-round process in which the supervisor observes, documents performance, and provides feedback and coaching to the employee. The supervisor should maintain performance documentation throughout the evaluation period to assist in the preparation of the annual evaluation.  The evaluation period is a two-way exchange of information.  Employees are encouraged to seek and provide periodic input to their supervisor during the evaluation period.  

 

ANNUAL EVALUATION RATING PROCESS

At the end of the evaluation period, supervisors will complete an evaluation of assigned employees.  Appropriate DTC forms will be used to document the evaluation.  The evaluation forms are completed by the supervisors indicating how the employee met performance goals. The evaluation will include a summary of strengths, needed improvements, and professional development goals.  The overall rating provided by the supervisor will be based on the general performance of the employee.  Comments should be made to clarify the identified strengths and weaknesses contained in the performance evaluation.  Evaluations results should be discussed with the supervising Vice President prior to delivering the evaluation to the employee.   

 

DELIVERY OF THE EVALUATION TO EMPLOYEE

The evaluation form should have the approval of the Vice President and Dean/Director prior to meeting with the employee.  The evaluation results should be discussed during a meeting with the employee.  The employee and immediate supervisor should sign the evaluation form at the conclusion of the meeting.  Employees may attach written comments to their evaluation. 

 

REVIEW PROCESS

Employees’ whose evaluations will result in not receiving a performance increase may request a review by the DTC reviewing official within 5 business days of receipt of the evaluation. 

 

DEVELOPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT PLANS

As part of the evaluation process, supervisors and employees will identify areas for professional development.  Development and improvement plans will be created based upon the annual performance evaluation.  These plans will be used to assist in determining appropriate conference and training opportunities for the next evaluation period.

Development activities include college courses; state or local staff development, industry workshops or seminars, planned business/industry update activities, or other organized and structured activities. Activities such as working with advisory committees, instructional materials development, shop/lab reorganization, etc., are considered to be a part of the normally assigned duties and are not considered as staff development activities.

Annual staff development plans are approved through the supervisory channels and submitted to the supervising Vice President for final approval following the same timelines established for annual evaluation.

Specific improvement plans will be developed for employees whose overall ratings are “needs improvement” or “unsatisfactory”. 

ANNUAL EVALUATION

Annual evaluations are submitted through channels to the Office of Human Resources to maintain in the official employee file.  Supportive documentation is maintained by the supervisor for a period of at least one year after the completion of the evaluation.

 

STAFF DEVELOPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT DOCUMENTATION

Successful completion of staff development activities must be documented on the Report of Staff Development Activity Form. Staff development records are to be maintained in the appropriate supervisor’s office.  Tracking progress toward completion of plans and auditing staff development records is the responsibility of the employee and the supervisor. 

Reports of completion of or failure to complete annual staff development plans will be submitted to the supervisor during the annual evaluation process.  This information is communicated to the President via the supervising Vice President and provides an indication of the level, types and cost of training activities engaged by staff for the fiscal year.

Participation in staff development programs as an official part of an employee's duty may not be used as earned overtime or compensatory time.

FACULTY EVALUATION FORMS

Faculty will be evaluated using the following documents:

1.      Faculty Self-Evaluation Form: completed by each individual faculty member and submitted to the appropriate Department Chair

2.      Student Evaluation of Instruction Form: completed electronically each quarter by students

3.      Faculty Evaluation Form: completed by supervisor

4.      Staff Development Plan: completed by supervisor and employee for the next fiscal year.

5.      Report of Faculty Development Activity Form: completed by the employee and submitted to their supervisor

STAFF EVALUAITON FORMS

Full Time Staff will be evaluated using the following documents:

1.      Staff Evaluation Form: completed by supervisor

2.      Report of Staff Development Activity Form: completed by the employee and submitted to their supervisor

Part-Time Staff will be evaluation using the following document:

1.      Part-Time Faculty and Staff Evaluation Form: completed by supervisor

 

TIME FRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT OF PLANNING DOCUMENT AND SUBMITTAL OF ANNUAL EVALUATION

Faculty Planning and Evaluation Schedule

Date

Action

Summer Quarter

Supervisor prepares planning document with employee. Reviewing Manager evaluates plan and makes necessary adjustments.

Faculty and Department Chair develop strategies and establish expectations for the upcoming evaluation period

Faculty and Department Chair identify activities for Professional Development, Student Support and College/Community Service

Students are asked to complete an electronic evaluation of instruction*

Faculty and Department Chairs meet to discuss strategy and set plans for the upcoming evaluation period

The Professional Development Form and Student Support and Service Activities Form is submitted to the supervising dean for approval

Faculty arranges classroom observation schedule and course(s) w/supervisor(s)

Fall Quarter

 

 

 

 

1st Week December

Ongoing coaching occurs throughout the evaluation process. This allows supervisor to observe performance, provide feedback, and document performance on a continual basis.

 

Document ongoing activities for Professional Development,  Student Support and College/Community Service

Student evaluation of instruction*

Winter Quarter

 

 

 

January

 

 

 

 

1st Week March

Supervisor documents ongoing activities for Professional Development and Student Support and College/Community Service.

 

Employee and supervisor meet to discuss interim performance progress.  Performance is discussed with the employee and development and improvements plans are reviewed and updated.

 

Student evaluation of instruction*

New faculty classroom observation is conducted.

Spring Quarter

 

 

 

 

1st Week April

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st Week June

Supervisor prepares the formal performance evaluation for review and discussion with their supervisor.  Staff Self Evaluation is completed by employee and submitted to the supervisor.

 

Document ongoing activities for Professional Development, Student Support and College/Community Service

Faculty arranges classroom observation with supervisor(s)

Faculty completes self-evaluation

Employee complete documentation of all activities

Faculty participates with supervisor in annual evaluation conference

 

Student evaluation of instruction*

 

Full-Time Staff Planning and Evaluation Schedule

Date

Action

April through May

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May

 

 

 

 

June

Supervisor reviews employees’ performance based on identified job expectations. Performance is discussed with the supervisor’s manager and feedback incorporated in to the evaluation.

Staff evaluation is discussed with the employee.

 

Development and Improvement needs are discussed and documented. 

 

The original signed evaluation is sent to personnel and a copy is given to the employee. The supervisor maintains a copy of the evaluation and supporting documentation for a period of at least a year. 

 

A new performance plan is prepared for the next rating period.

June to May

 

Ongoing coaching occurs. Supervisor observes the employee’s performance and provides periodic feedback.  Supervisor maintains documentation of employee performance.

November to

January

 

Supervisor conducts an interim review.  Performance is discussed with the staff member.  Development and improvement plans are reviewed and updated.

Part-Time Evaluation Schedule

Date

Action

May

 

 

 

 

June

Supervisor reviews employees’ performance based on identified job expectations.  Performance is discussed with the supervisor’s manager and feedback incorporated in to the evaluation.  

Staff evaluation is discussed with the employee.

 

The original signed evaluation is sent to personnel and a copy is given to the employee. The supervisor maintains a copy of the evaluation and supporting documentation for a period of at least a year. 

June to May

 

Ongoing coaching occurs. Supervisor observes performance, provides feedback, and documents performance. 

These procedures are in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Board Policies of the Technical College System of Georgia.

References:

Technical College System of Georgia III. U. 7. Staff Development

Technical College System of Georgia III G. Performance Evaluation and Salary Compensation

Technical College System of Georgia III. G. Procedures Performance Evaluation and Salary Compensation Procedures

Approved 08/99

Revised 02/01, 8/2007